Senate
House Committee on Privatisation has disclosed that the aviation sector will
get zero allocation in the 2017 budget proposal that the president will
present soon. The committee, led by its chairman, Senator Ben Murray-Bruce,
said that the plan to concession the airports and readiness of private
investors to assume responsibility means that the Federal Government would no
longer need to commit revenue to run the facilities.Meanwhile, the committee
has also said it would summon the Minister of State for Aviation, Hadi
Sirika, to explain why the Murtala Muhammed Airport II (MMA2) terminal
concession agreement failed and still not resolved till date.The botched
agreement, according to them, remains a bad reference point for future
dealings with the Federal Government and would make no sense continuing with
privatisation of other airports without first resolving the MMA2
impasse.Murray-Bruce explained that from his understanding of happenings in
the aviation sector, the private sector is able and willing to fix problems
in the industry.He, therefore, said: “I will lobby my colleagues to give
aviation zero allocation henceforth. There is no point giving them money
where private investors can do better. When you don’t give them money, then
you’ll solve a lot of problem.“The advantage is that the billions we could
have spent in aviation can now be spent in education, healthcare and in the
north east where children are hungry due to the catastrophe of the Boko
Haram. So, we’ll give up this economy completely to the private sector as it
is done in other parts of the world,” he said.Murray-Bruce, shortly after the
tour of the MMA2 terminal in Lagos recently, said underlining such project,
and others like it, were legally binding agreements reached by the Federal
Government and private investors.He said Nigerians need to know why agencies
of the government would not honour agreements they freely entered and onus is
on the minister to explain.Recall that the Federal Airports Authority of
Nigeria (FAAN) and Bi-Courtney Limited in 2003 reached a Build-Operate-Transfer
concession agreement on MMA2 terminal that was burnt in 2000. Shortly after
the terminal was rebuilt, years of operations (15 or 35years), before it is
transferred to FAAN, became a subject of protracted legal battle between FAAN
and Bi-Courtney. While Bi-Courtney insisted on 35, FAAN in disagreement began
to violate the agreement with the construction of the General Aviation
Terminal (GAT) to rival the MMA2, prevention of the Regional Operations to
take off at MMA2, among others that led to loss of revenue to the
oncessionaire.Murray-Bruce said: “We have listened to Bi-Courtney’s side of
the argument and we will summon the Minister of Aviation to the Assembly to
present his side of the argument. It is not enough to tell me what FAAN is
doing or not doing. FAAN is a parastatal of the ministry of aviation and
there is no point talking to FAAN on this,” he said.The chairman said that
the invitation was ultimately to broker a solution to the problem, which past
committees had not been able to address. Source:
Guardian |
Search This Blog
Friday, December 2, 2016
Senate to award zero allocation to aviation in 2017 budget
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment